הוריות ב׳Horayot 2

Mishnah

משנה: אֵין חַיָיבִין אֶלָא עַל הֶעֱלֵם דָּבָר עִם שִׁגְגַת הַמַּעֲשֶׂה וְכֵן הַמָּשִׁיחַ. וְלֹא בַעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה אֶלָּא עַל הֶעֱלֵם דָּבָר עִם שִׁגְגַת הַמַּעֲשֶׂה.

MISHNAH: They are liable only for forgetting a topic with action in error; the same applies to the Anointed. Also for idolatry only for forgetting a topic with action in error.

Halakhah

הלכה: אֵין חַיָיבִין אֶלָא עַל הֶעֱלֵם דָּבָר כול׳. רִבִּי זְעִירָא בְשֵׁם רַב יִרְמְיָה. מַתְנִיתָא דְּרִבִּי מֵאִיר אוֹ דִיֵיק רִבִּי מֵאִיר. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵי. רִבִּי מֵאִיר דּוּ אָמַר. חוֹבַת בֵּית דִּין הִיא. אָמַר רִבִּי מָנָא כְּרִבִּי מֵאִיר. תַּנֵּי תַמָּן. הוֹרוּ בֵית דִּין וְעָשׂוּ קָהָל. מֵת אֶחָד מִבֵּית דִּין פְּטוּרִין. מֵת אֶחָד מִן הַצִּיבּוּר חַיָיבִין. אָמַר לָהֶן רִבִּי מֵאִיר. אִם לַאֲחֵרִים הוּא פוֹטֵר לֹא כָל שֶׁכֵּן עַל עַצְמוֹ. אָמְרוּ לוֹ. יִפְטוֹר לַאֲחֵרִים שֶׁיֵּשׁ לָהֶן בַּמֶּה לִתְלוֹת. וְאַל יִפְטוֹר לְעַצְמוֹ שֶׁאֵין לוֹ בַּמֶּה לִתְלוֹת.

HALAKHAH: “They are liable only for forgetting,” etc. Rebbi Zeˋira in the name of Rav Jeremiah. The Mishnah is Rebbi Meïr’s or has inferences like Rebbi Meïr. Rebbi Yose said, Rebbi Meïr who said, it is an obligation of the Court. Rebbi Mana said, following Rebbi Meïr. There, it was stated: If the Court ruled and the public acted. If a member of the Court died, they are not liable. If a member of the public died, they are liable. Rebbi Meïr told them, if he relieves others of their liability, not so much more for himself? They told him, he can relieve others of their liability since they have where to hang on; he cannot relieve himself of liability since he has nothing to hang on.

רִבִּי יִרְמְיָה בְעָא קוֹמֵי רִבִּי זְעִירָא. מַה כְרִבִּי. אִין. מָשִׁיחַ בִּשִׁיגְּגַת מַעֲשֶׂה הוּא. וְאִין כְרָבָּנִן. בְּהֶעֱלֵם דָּבָר הוּא. אָמַר רִבִּי הוּנָא. עַל רַבָּנִן נִצְרְכָה. שֶׁלֹּא תֹאמַר. מָשִׁיחַ וָעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה. רִבִּי אָמַר. בִּשִׁגְּגַת מַעֲשֶׂה. וְרַבָּנִן אָמְרִין. בְּהֶעֱלֵם דָּבָר. אָמַר מה לקל מה בְּגִין דְּלֹא תַנִּינָן מָשִׁיחַ. וְהָא קַדְמִיתָא לֹא תַנֵּינָן מָשִׁיחַ וּמָשִׁיחַ בִּכְלָל. וָכָא אַף עַל גַּב דְּלֹא תַנִּינָן מָשִׁיחַ מָשִׁיחַ בִּכְלָל.

Rebbi Jeremiah asked before Rebbi Zeˋira: Maybe following Rebbi? If the Anointed, error in action it is. But if the rabbis, oblivion of a topic it is. Rebbi Huna said, it was needed for the rabbis. That you should not say, the Anointed and idolatry: Rebbi said, in acting in error; the rabbis said, in forgetting a topic. He said [], because we did not state about the Anointed. But in the former, we did not state about the Anointed but the Anointed is included, and here, even though we did not state about the Anointed, the Anointed is included.

Mishnah

משנה: אֵין חַיָיבִין אֶלָּא עַל דָּבָר שֶׁזְּדוֹנוֹ כָרֵת וְשִׁגְגָתוֹ חַטָּאת וְכֵן הַמָּשִׁיחַ. וְלֹא בַעֲבוֹדָה זָרָה אֶלָּא עַל דָּבָר שֶׁזְּדוֹנוֹ כָרֵת וְשִׁגְגָתוֹ חַטָּאת:

MISHNAH: They are liable only for something which when intentional is punishable by extirpation and when unintentional by a purification sacrifice. The same applies to the Anointed. Also for idolatry only for something which when intentional is punishable by extirpation and when unintentional by a purification sacrifice.

Halakhah

הלכה: אֵין חַיָיבִין אֶלָּא עַל דָּבָר שֶׁזְּדוֹנוֹ כָרֵת כול׳. מִצְוֹת יְי. הָיִיתִי אוֹמֵר. אַף אוֹכְלֵי שְׁקָצִים וּרְמָשִׂים בְּמַשְׁמַע. נֶאֱמַר כָּאן מֵעֵינֵי וְנֶאֱמַר לְהַלָּן מֵעֵינֵי. מַה מֵעֵינֵי שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר לְהַלָּן דָּבָר שֶׁחַיָיבִין עַל זְדוֹנוֹ כָרֵת וְעַל שִׁגְגָתוֹ חַטָּאת. אַף מֵעֵינֵי שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר כָּאן דָּבָר שֶׁחַיָיבִין עַל זְדוֹנוֹ כָרֵת וְעַל שִׁגְגָתוֹ חַטָּאת. אוֹ מַה מֵעֵינֵי שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר לְהַלָּן דָּבָר שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ מִיתַת בֵּית דִּין. אַף מֵעֵינֵי שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר כָּאן דָּבָר שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ מִיתַת בֵּית דִּין. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵי בַּר חֲנִינָה. מָקוֹם שֶׁנִּכְלְלוּ כָל הָעֲרָיוֹת לְהִיכָּרֵת. יָצָא אֵשֶׁת אִישׁ אֲבָל לְלַמֵּד עַל הַמַּמְזֵר. רִבִּי אוֹמֵר. עָלֶיהָ עָלֶיהָ. מַה עָלֶיהָ שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר לְהַלָּן דָּבָר שֶׁחַיָיבִין עַל זְדוֹנוֹ כָרֵת וְעַל שִׁגְגָתוֹ חַטָּאת. אַף עָלֶיהָ שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר כָּאן דָּבָר שֶׁחַיָיבִין עַל זְדוֹנוֹ כָרֵת וְעַל שִׁגְגָתוֹ חַטָּאת. וְלָמָּה לֹא דָרַשׁ רִבִּי מֵעֵינֵי מֵעֵינֵי. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵי. אִין יִדְרוֹשׁ רִבִּי מֵעֵינֵי מֵעֵינֵי. מַה מֵעֵינֵי שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר לְהַלָּן דָּבָר שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ מִיתַת בֵּית דִּין. אַף מֵעֵינֵי שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר כָּאן דָּבָר שֶׁיֵּשׁ בּוֹ מִיתַת בֵּית דִּין. לְפוּם כֵּן לֹא דָרַשׁ רִבִּי מֵעֵינֵי מֵעֵינֵי. וְלֵית לֵיהּ סִפְרָא דְרִבִּי מִידְרוֹשׁ מֵעֵינֵי מֵעֵינֵי. דִּלֹא כֵן מְנָן לֵיהּ הַיָּחִיד וְהַנָּשִׂיא וְהַמָּשִׁיחַ. לֹא מֵעֵינֵי מֵעֵינֵי. דִּלֹא כֵן מְנָן לֵיהּ הוֹרָיַית בֵּית דִּין גָּדוֹל הוֹרָיַית בֵּית דִּין קָטָן לֹא מֵעֵינֵי מֵעֵינֵי. אָמַר רִבִּי חֲנַנְיָה קוֹמֵי רִבִּי מָנָא. עַד שֶׁיּוֹרוּ לְבַטֵּל מִקְצָת וּלְקַיֵים מִקְצָת לֹא מֵעֵינֵי מֵעֵינֵי. דִּלֹא כֵן מְנָן לֵיהּ הוֹרָיַית בֵּית דִּין קָטָן לֹא מֵעֵינֵי מֵעֵינֵי. אָמַר רִבִּי חֲנַנְיָה קוֹמֵי רִבִּי מָנָא. וְלֵית סוֹפֵיהּ דְּרִבִּי מִידְרוֹשׁ מֵעֵינֵי מֵעֵינֵי. אָמַר לֵיהּ. מָה אַתְּ בָּעֵי מֵרִבִּי. רִבִּי כְדַעְתֵּיהּ. דְּרִבִּי אָמַר. מָשִׁיחַ בִּשִׁגְּגַת הַמַּעֲשֶׂה הוּא. וְאֵין כְּתִיב זָדוֹן שְׁגָגָה לְיָחִיד אֶלָּא בְבֵית דִּין וּבִלְבַד. אוֹתוֹ. מִיעֵט קָרְבָּנוֹ לְמִצְוָה יְחִידִית שֶׁלֹּא יִכָּנֵס דָּמוֹ לִפְנִים. מָה כְרִבִּי. דְּרִבִּי אָמַר. מָשִׁיחַ בְּשִׁיגְגַת הַמַּעֲשֶׂה הוּא. וְאִין כְתבָּנִן בְּהֶעֱלֵם דָּבָר הוּא. אָמַר רַב הוּנָא. עַל דְּרַבָּנִן נִצְרְכָה. שֶׁלֹּא תֹאמַר. הוֹאִיל וְהוּא בְהִיכָּרֵת יִכָּנֵס דָּמוֹ לִפְנַיי לִפְנִים. לְפוּם כֵּן צָרִיךְ מֵימַר. אוֹתוֹ. מִיעֵט קָרְבָּנוֹ לְמִצְוָה יְחִידִית שֶׁלֹּא יִכָּנֵס דָּמוֹ לִפְנִים.

HALAKHAH: “They are only liable for something which when intentional is punishable by extirpation,” etc. The commandments of the Eternal. I could think that this also includes those who eat abominations and crawling things. It says here from the eyes and it says there from the eyes. Just as from the eyes mentioned there means something which is punished by extirpation in case of intentional sin and needs a purification sacrifice for an inadvertent sin, so from the eyes mentioned here means something which is punished by extirpation in case of intentional sin and needs a purification sacrifice for an inadvertent sin. Or since from the eyes mentioned there means something that can lead to the death penalty, so from the eyes mentioned here should mean something that can lead to the death penalty? Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina said, from a place where all incest prohibitions were taken as one set [of sins] causing extirpation, the (married woman) [father’s wife] came out to tell you about the bastard. Rebbi said over which, over her. Since over her mentioned there refers to something which is punished by extirpation in case of intentional sin and needs a purification sacrifice for an inadvertent sin, so over which mentioned here means something for which one is punished by extirpation in case of intentional sin and needs a purification sacrifice for an inadvertent sin. Why does Rebbi not infer from from the eyes, from the eyes? [Rebbi Zeˋira said: If Rebbi would infer from from the eyes, from the eyes, then from the eyes mentioned there for the Anointed refers to action in error; also from the eyes mentioned here would have to refer to action in error. Therefore, Rebbi will not infer from from the eyes, from the eyes.] Rebbi Yose said: If Rebbi would infer from from the eyes, from the eyes, then since from the eyes mentioned there means something that can lead to the death penalty, so from the eyes mentioned here means something that can lead to the death penalty. Therefore, Rebbi does not infer from from the eyes, from the eyes. (Does Rebbi not have a book) [Will Rebbi not in the end have] to infer from the eyes, from the eyes? For if it is not so, from where would we have the rules for the individual, the chief, and the Anointed? Not from from the eyes, from the eyes? For if it is not so, from where would we have “unless they ruled to eliminate part and to confirm part”? Not from from the eyes, from the eyes? For if it is not so, from where would we have [the difference between] a ruling of the High Court and a ruling of a lower court? Rebbi Ḥanania said before Rebbi Mana: Would not Rebbi in the end have to infer from from the eyes, from the eyes? He told him, what do you want from Rebbi? Rebbi follows his own opinion, since Rebbi said, the Anointed refers to action in error. Intentional error is only written for the Court. It. It specifies about his sacrifice that for the singular commandment its blood should not be brought into the Sanctuary. Does this follow Rebbi, as Rebbi said, the Anointed refers to action in error; if it would follow the rabbis, there must be an instance of forgetting. (Rav) [Rebbi] Huna said, it was needed for the rabbis. Lest you say, because there is extirpation its blood should be brought into the Sanctuary. Therefore, it was necessary to say it, it specifies his sacrifice that for the singular commandment its blood should not be brought into the Sanctuary.