Yoreh De'ahAll 1,704 simanim of the Shulchan Aruch open with Premium, from $2.60 a month.Become a premium member

The Shulchan Aruch · Yoreh De'ah

יורה דעה שע״וYoreh De'ah 376

Siman 376 of 402 in Yoreh De'ah — 4 se'ifim

הלכות אבילותMourning· siman 376

Se’if 1א׳

אֵין הַמְנַחֲמִים רַשָּׁאִים לִפְתֹּחַ, עַד שֶׁיִּפְתַּח הָאָבֵל תְּחִלָה. וְהָאָבֵל מֵסֵב בָּרֹאשׁ, וְכֵיוָן שֶׁנִּעְנַע הָאָבֵל בְּרֹאשׁוֹ, בְּעִנְיָן שֶׁנִּרְאֶה שֶׁפּוֹטֵר אֶת הַמְנַחֲמִים, אֵינָם רַשָּׁאִים לֵישֵׁב אֶצְלוֹ. אֵין אָבֵל אוֹ חוֹלֶה חַיָּבִים לַעֲמֹד, אֲפִלּוּ מִפְּנֵי נָשִׂיא (פ' א"מ).

The comforters are not permitted to open [conversation] until the mourner opens first; and the mourner reclines at the head [of the mourner's meal];2M.K. ibid.; Ket. 69b. This refers to meals served in the house of mourning, and is derived from Job’s statement, ‘I chose out their way, and sat chief (head), and dwelt as a king in the army, as one comforteth the mourners’ (Job XXIX, 25). The last part of the verse, ‘as one comforteth the mourners’ is rendered as the Pu‘al ינוחם i.e., ‘one who is comforteth.’ This is in accord with R. Abbahu ibid. Mar Zutra derives this ruling from Amos VI, 7, which he interprets as, ‘he who is bitter (of soul) and distracted (through bereavement) is made the chief of those banqueting (i.e., the mourner must sit at the head of the meal).’ E. has, ‘and the revelry of them that stretched themselves shall pass away.’ and as soon as the mourner nods his head in a manner from which it is indicative that he dismisses the comforters,3So that they retire. they are not permitted to remain seated by him.4M.K. 27b in accord with R. Joḥanan. For the mourner is not permitted to bid them farewell with the word ‘Peace’ שלום — N in T.H. on the authority of Ghayyat. A mourner or a sick person are not required to rise even on account of a Nasi.5 Glos. M.K. III (27b) — G. For this is not considered rising that bestows honour — R. A. Eger. Kid. 32b.

Se’if 2ב׳

הַבָּא לְכַבֵּד אֶת חֲבֵרוֹ וְלָקוּם מִפָּנָיו, אוֹמֵר לוֹ: שֵׁב, אֶלָא אִם כֵּן הוּא אָבֵל אוֹ חוֹלֶה, דְּמַשְׁמָע: שֵׁב בָּאֲבֵלוּת שֶׁלְךָ, שֵׁב בַּחֹלִי שֶׁלְךָ. הַגָּה: לֹא יֹאמַר אָדָם: לֹא נִפְרַעְתִּי כְּפִי מַעֲשַׂי, אוֹ כַּיּוֹצֵא בִּדְבָרִים אֵלּוּ, שֶׁאַל יִפְתַּח פִּיו לַשָּׂטָן (כֵּן מַשְׁמָע בְּפֶרֶק מִי שֶׁמֵּתוֹ וּבְהַגָּהוֹת אַלְפָסִי שָׁם). וְאַל יֹאמַר אָדָם לְאָבֵל: מַה לְּךְ לַעֲשׂוֹת כִּי אִי אֶפְשָׁר לְשַׁנּוֹת, שֶׁזֶּהוּ כְּגִדּוּף, דְּמַשְׁמָע הָא אִם אֶפְשָׁר לְשַׁנּוֹת הָיָה עוֹשֶׂה, אֶלָּא יְקַבֵּל עָלָיו גְּזֵרַת הַשֵּׁם יִתְבָּרַךְ מֵאַהֲבָה (נ"י פ' שׁוֹר שֶׁנָּגַח דְּמַשְׁמָע כֵּן בַּגְּמָרָא).

To one who comes to show honour to his friend6Who is an elderly or distinguished person. and to rise at his presence, [the latter] should say, 'Be seated,' unless he is a mourner or a sick person,7Who rose, although he is not required to do so (cf. supra par. 1) — A.H. — for [such a statement] would imply, 'Be seated in your mourning,' or 'Be seated in your illness.'8M.K. 27b. Gloss: A man should not say, 'I was not punished in accordance with my [evil] deeds,' or anything similar to these words, for a man should never utter anything in such a way as to give Satan an opening.9Thus implied in Ber. 19a and Hag. Alfasi ibid. — G. Uttering such words would invite Satan to inflict more punishment. Neither should a man say to a mourner, 'What could you have done; it is impossible to change [God's verdict],' for this is regarded as blasphemy, since it implies that were it possible to change [the verdict] he would have done so; but one should accept God's decree out of love.10N.Yos. to B.K. 38a — G. MaHaRShaL rejects this ruling in view of the fact that King David uttered a similar statement on the loss of his child, viz., ‘But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? Can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he will not return to me’ (II Sam. XII, 23), which implies that were it possible to bring him back again, he would have done so. TaZ opposes MaHaRShaL and defends this ruling on the grounds that in the case of King David he merely expressed the fact that after death, fasting etc. is of no avail, but prior to death, needless to say, one should engage in prayer and fasting in order to counteract impending death. But once a person has suffered a bereavement, prayer and fasting no longer help. Hence, if one says to a mourner, ‘What could you have done etc.’ it is tantamount to blashphemy. also P.Tesh. For this very reason the Taḥanun prayer is not recited in a mourner’s home, since it contains the words, ‘I have sinned etc.,’ nor the penitential prayer (והוא רחום) which contains, ‘deal not with us according to our sins’ — A.H. infra par. 3 and notes. The custom not to remove anything from the home of a mourner has no basis — Yosef Omeẓ. R. A. Eger however, adopts a stringency in this matter. The mirrors are covered up in a home where mourning services are held because one is not permitted to recite prayers in front of a mirror so as not to pray to one's reflection — Reshumoth I, p. 371. For additional reasons, v. Kol Bo(G) I, p. 262, 11.

Se’if 3ג׳

מֵת שֶׁאֵין לוֹ אֲבֵלִים לְהִתְנַחֵם, בָּאִים עֲשָׂרָה בְּנֵי אָדָם כְּשֵׁרִים וְיוֹשְׁבִים בִּמְקוֹמוֹ כָּל ז' יְמֵי הָאֲבֵלוּת, וּשְׁאָר הָעָם מִתְקַבְּצִים עֲלֵיהֶם; וְאִם לֹא הָיוּ שָׁם עֲשָׂרָה קְבוּעִים, בְּכָל יוֹם וְיוֹם מִתְקַבְּצִים עֲשָׂרָה מִשְּׁאָר הָעָם וְיוֹשְׁבִים בִּמְקוֹמוֹ. הַגָּה: וְלֹא רָאִיתִי נוֹהֲגִין כֵּן. וְכָתוּב במהרי"ל: נוֹהֲגִים לְהִתְפַּלֵּל בַּעֲשָׂרָה כָּל ז' בַּמָּקוֹם שֶׁנִּפְטַר שָׁם הָאָדָם, וְהַיְנוּ עַל אָדָם שֶׁלֹּא הִנִּיחַ קְרוֹבִים יְדוּעִים לְהִתְאַבֵּל עָלָיו, אֲבָל יֵשׁ לוֹ בְּשׁוּם מָקוֹם שֶׁמִּתְאַבְּלִים עָלָיו, אֵין צָרִיךְ וְכָזֶה רָאוּי לִנְהֹג.

A corpse who leaves11Lit. ‘has.’ no mourners to be comforted,— [the law is that] ten worthy people come and sit in his place12Where the person died. This is done every day. It is, however, not necessary that they remain there throughout the day. throughout the seven days of mourning and the rest of the people assemble unto them. If ten permanent people were not present there daily, ten of the rest of the people assemble and sit in his place.13Shab. 152a. Cf. Yad, Ebel XIII, 4. This affords pleasure to the soul of the departed, as it is related (ibid.) about a certain individual who died in the neighbourhood of R. Judah, and since there were no survivors, he assembled ten men daily in the place where the person died. After the seven days, the dead person appeared to R. Judah in a dream and said to him, ‘Let your mind be at ease, for you have set my mind at ease.’ Gloss: However, I have not seen this custom in practice. In the [writings] of Maharil it is stated that it is customary to recite the Tefillah32 Glos. in [the presence of] ten [males] throughout the seven [days of mourning] at the place where the person died,14 O.Ḥ. § 134, 4 where it is stated that the Taḥanun prayer is not recited in the house of a mourner for the entire seven days (v. supra n. 10). Nor is the Hallel said in a mourner’s house on Rosh Ḥodesh, for it contains the verse, ‘the dead praise not the Lord’ and this would be regarded as mocking the poor (-dead) — TaZ. It is customary, however, that Hallel is said in a house of mourning, only that the mourners leave the room when the Hallel is recited. There is a further reason why the Hallel is omitted by mourners. For it contains verses such as, ‘This is the day which the Lord hath made; we will be glad and rejoice thereon,’ which is not in keeping with mourning rites. A mourner may recite the Habdalah prayer during the mourning period, but should omit the introductory verses which express joy. Only the benediction of this prayer should be recited by him. If the seventh day of mourning coincides with Rosh Ḥodesh, the mourner should recite the Hallel after the morning services are over, for then he is no longer a mourner — P.Tesh. Cf. supra par. 2 and notes. For a complete list of the prayers that are omitted in a mourner’s house, v, Kol Bo(G) I, pp. 277-28 i.e., for a person who left no known [near-of-kin] to observe mourning rites for him;15 infra § 384, 3 Gloss. but if he has [near-of-kin] somewhere who observe mourning rites for him, one is not required [to do this]. And this is the practice which is proper to adopt.

Become a premium member

Or start free — a free account opens your first 5 gematria searches in full. Create free account

The daily learning is free on your account, every day.

Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah — Torat Emet 357 edition, via Sefaria — public domain

English: Code of Hebrew Law, tr. Chaim N. Denburg, Montreal 1955 — CC BY