The Shulchan Aruch · Even HaEzer
אבן העזר קנ״טEven HaEzer 159
Siman 159 of 178 in Even HaEzer — 7 se'ifim
הלכות יבוםLaws of Yibbum· siman 159
Se’if 1א׳
הַזְּקוּקָה לְיָבָם שֶׁנִּתְקַדְּשָׁה לְאַחֵר בְּשׁוֹגֵג, נוֹתֵן לָהּ הַזָּר שֶׁקִּדְּשָׁהּ גֵּט, וִיבָמָהּ מְיַבֵּם אוֹ חוֹלֵץ. אִם הָיָה יְבָמָהּ כֹּהֵן, שֶׁאֵינוֹ יָכוֹל לִשָּׂא גְּרוּשָׁה, תֵּצֵא מֵהַזָּר בְּגֵט, כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יְהֵא חוֹטֵא נִשְׂכָּר, וְחוֹלֵץ לָהּ יְבָמָהּ. וְאִם חָזַר הַזָּר שֶׁגֵּרְשָׁהּ מֵהָאֵרוּסִין, וְנָשְׂאָהּ אַחַר שֶׁחָלַץ לָהּ יְבָמָהּ, אֵין מוֹצִיאִין אוֹתָהּ מִיָּדוֹ. הַגָּה: וְיֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים דְּאֲפִלּוּ חָזַר וּנְשָׂאָהּ, מוֹצִיאִין אוֹתָהּ מִיָּדוֹ, הוֹאִיל וְנִתְקַדְּשָׁה לוֹ בְּאִסוּר. וְדַוְקָא אִם קִדְּשָׁהּ בְּמֵזִיד, אֲבָל אִם קִדְּשָׁהּ בְּשׁוֹגֵג, שֶׁלֹּא יָדְעוּ שֶׁהָיָה לָהּ יָבָם, אִם רוֹצֶה הַיָּבָם לְיַבֵּם, צָרִיךְ הַמְקַדֵּשׁ לְגָרְשָׁהּ; וְאִם רוֹצֶה הַיָּבָם לַחֲלֹץ, חוֹלֵץ לָהּ וְנִשֵּׂאת לַמְקַדֵּשׁ, וְצָרִיךְ לַחֲזֹר וּלְקַדֵּשׁ אוֹתָהּ אַחֵר שֶׁחָלַץ לָהּ יְבָמָהּ (ר"ת); וְכֵן נִרְאֶה לִי עִקָּר. וְיֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים דַּוְקָא בְּשׁוֹגֵג גָּמוּר, שֶׁלֹּא יָדְעוּ שֶׁיֵּשׁ כָּאן יָבָם. אֲבָל הָיָה כָּאן יָבָם, אֶלָּא שֶׁהָיָה סְבוּרָה שֶׁמֵּת, כִּי כֵּן יָצָא הַקּוֹל, תֵּצֵא מִן הַמְקַדֵּשׁ (ת"ה סִי' רכ"ב):
One connected to a brother-in-law who became betrothed to another by accident -- the outsider who betrothed her gives her a bill [of divorce], and her brother-in-law does levirate marriage or chalitsah. If her brother-in-law was a kohen, who cannot wed a divorcee, she leaves the outsider with a bill [of divorce] so that a sinner not profit [thereby], and her brother-in-law effects chalitsah with her. If the outsider, who divorced her from betrothal, returns and nisu'in-marries her after her brother-in-law has effected chalitsah with her, we do not remove her from him. Comment: And some say that even if he returned and nisu'in-married her, we do remove her from him, since she was betrothed to him illicitly. That [however] is specifically if he betrothed her on purpose, but if he betrothed her by accident -- that they did not know she had a brother-in-law -- [then:] if the brother-in-law wishes to effect levirate marriage, the betrother must divorce her, [but] if the brother-in-law wishes to effect chalitsah, he does chalitsah and she is nisu'in-married to the betrother; and he must betroth her again after her brother-in-law has effected chalitsah (Rabbi Tam). So seems principal to me. And some say [this is] specifically in [a case of] complete accident, that they did not know that there is a brother-in-law present, but if a brother-in-law had been present but it was thought that he was dead -- for so the rumor had spread -- she shall leave the betrother (Torat HaBayit chapter 222).
Se’if 2ב׳
נִשֵּׂאת לְזָר, אֲפִלּוּ בְּשׁוֹגֵג, מוֹצִיאָהּ בְּגֵט, וַאֲפִלּוּ הָיוּ לוֹ בָּנִים מִמֶּנָּה; וְנֶאֶסְרָה עָלָיו וְעַל יְבָמָהּ, וְי"ג דְּרָכִים שֶׁנִּתְבָּאֲרוּ בְּסִימָן י"ז בָּהּ, אֶלָּא שֶׁאֵין הַוָּלָד מַמְזֵר. וְיֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים שֶׁהוּא מַמְזֵר מִדְּרַבָּנָן. וִיבָמָהּ חוֹלֵץ לָהּ, וְאַחַר כָּךְ תִּהְיֶה מֻתֶּרֶת לַאֲחֵרִים וְעַיֵּן לְעֵיל סִימָן קנ"ז סָעִיף ד':
A woman who had been bound for levirate marriage, but instead married (by nisuin) an outsider, even accidentally, he must divorce her, even if they had children together. She is forbidden to him and also to the yavam (living brother of her late husband). The thirteen rules listed in chapter 17 (I believe referring to se'if 55, regarding a woman who remarried in the lifetime of her husband who had been mistakenly thought dead) apply, except that her progeny (from the outsider) is not a mamzer (bastard). Some say that the child has a status of Rabbinic mamzer. Her yavam gives her chalitza (ceremony dissolving the levirate bond), and she is then permitted to marry others. (Comment: See supra chapter 157 se'if 4).
Se’if 3ג׳
שׁוֹמֶרֶת יָבָם שֶׁזִּנְּתָה, לֹא נֶאֶסְרָה עַל יְבָמָהּ, אִם הוּא יִשְׂרָאֵל. וְיֵשׁ אוֹמְרִים דַּאֲסוּרָה לַבּוֹעֵל מִשּׁוּם קְנָסָא (נ"י פֶּרֶק הָאִשָּׁה):
A woman bound for levirate marriage (shomeret yavam) who committed fornication, does not become forbidden to the yavam (surviving brother of her late husband) if he is an Israelite (non-priest). Rama: Some authorities say that she is forbidden to her partner in fornication by k'nas - rabbinic punishment (Nimukei Yosef chapter haIsha).
Shulchan Aruch, Even HaEzer — Torat Emet 357 edition, via Sefaria — public domain
English: Sefaria Community Translation — CC0